Texas DWI Defense Attorney Says Evaluating Truthfulness of Witnesses is Part of a Strong Defense


If you are the defendant in a Texas DWI case, it is critical that you pursue the resolution of your case with the aid of a Texas DWI defense attorney. DWI defense attorneys are skilled in crafting effective strategies that have the potential to prevent the conviction of innocent clients and obtain a fair resolution of cases in which defendants did drive while intoxicated. Texas DWI defense attorneys build defense strategies for their clients based upon their experience in defending others charged with similar crimes as well as the facts of each client’s case.

Witnesses are an essential component of any criminal law matter, and DWI cases are no exception. A skilled defense attorney evaluates the credibility, the reputation for truthfulness, of each witness that the state plans to bring before the court to speak on the prosecution’s behalf. Sometimes, discrediting a witness who has proven to be untruthful in other matters can be critical to a court’s decision to find an innocent defendant not guilty. At the very least, exposing witnesses who are likely to be untruthful demands that the prosecution present truthful witnesses with quality testimony to support their version of what happened.

It is especially critical that defense attorneys examine the quality of police witnesses. Prosecutors often bring law enforcement officers before the court as witnesses in DWI cases. Unfortunately, not all of those officers are honest, and prosecutors do not always examine the conduct and history of the officers they plan to call as witnesses. The result is that some officers whose previous behavior ought to disqualify them from testifying in a DWI matter appear as witnesses.

Sometimes, prosecutors are even able to wrongfully obtain convictions based on the testimony of individuals who should not have been allowed to testify. This is not only wrong, it is unconstitutional. In 1963, the United State’s Supreme Court issued a decision in the case of Brady v. Maryland that requires prosecutors to inform all persons accused of crimes of the existence of any evidence that might aid in their defense. The Brady decision includes, but is not limited to, disclosing information about police witnesses who have been found guilty of misconduct on the job or of lying.

One reason that prosecutors are failing to comply with the requirements of Brady is that they do not track the behavior of the officers they call as witnesses. They also do not question the integrity of those officers before putting them on the witness stand.  The problem doesn’t just exist in Texas; it is an issue of national concern – over three hundred prosecutors’ offices in cities large and small do not keep lists of dishonest officers. In places where such lists are kept, they are often not accessible to the public so their compliance with the requirements of Brady or the lack thereof cannot be known. It is critical that the public pressure prosecutors to maintain and make available “Brady” lists. Failure to keep to those lists and disclose them can prevent defense attorneys from being able to access information about witnesses that could aid them in preparing the best possible defense for their clients, which is not only wrong but also unconstitutional.

A Texas DWI Defense Attorney can help you navigate your Texas DWI case. Call Attorney Alex Tyra today, at (903) 753-7499, or fill out a contact form on our website.